# Is there any chance of an portable version?

**URL:** <https://discussion.listary.com/t/is-there-any-chance-of-an-portable-version/8506>\
**Category:** Feature Request\
**Created:** [August 4, 2023, 4:53pm UTC](https://discussion.listary.com/t/is-there-any-chance-of-an-portable-version/8506 "2023-08-04T16:53:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 9\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ron](https://discussion.listary.com/user_avatar/discussion.listary.com/ron/32/150_2.png) [@ron](https://discussion.listary.com/u/ron)\
**Post date:** [August 4, 2023, 4:53pm UTC](https://discussion.listary.com/t/is-there-any-chance-of-an-portable-version/8506/1 "2023-08-04T16:53:36Z")

</div>

Please reconsider releasing a portable version.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![horst](https://discussion.listary.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/h/edb3f5/32.png) [@horst](https://discussion.listary.com/u/horst)\
**Post date:** [August 4, 2023, 7:52pm UTC](https://discussion.listary.com/t/is-there-any-chance-of-an-portable-version/8506/2 "2023-08-04T19:52:45Z")

</div>

Without the background service with enhanced rights, there is no actual index.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HyperCriSiS](https://discussion.listary.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/h/8e8cbc/32.png) [@HyperCriSiS](https://discussion.listary.com/u/HyperCriSiS)\
**Post date:** [August 25, 2023, 9:23am UTC](https://discussion.listary.com/t/is-there-any-chance-of-an-portable-version/8506/3 "2023-08-25T09:23:00Z")

</div>

When started with elevated rights it should be no problem for the scanner.  
I also really need a portable version.  
Installing Software is so oldschool!!!

I hate installing software. In 99.9% of the time it just makes no sense and is just annoying.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![horst](https://discussion.listary.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/h/edb3f5/32.png) [@horst](https://discussion.listary.com/u/horst)\
**Post date:** [August 25, 2023, 9:57am UTC](https://discussion.listary.com/t/is-there-any-chance-of-an-portable-version/8506/4 "2023-08-25T09:57:52Z")

</div>

It makes sense in this case.  
It’s much more annoying to acknowledge the UAC for each Listary start.  
Without a background service, the index must be updated even when you run the client with enhanced rights.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![listary\_sev](https://discussion.listary.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/l/258eb7/32.png) [@listary\_sev](https://discussion.listary.com/u/listary_sev)\
**Post date:** [September 3, 2023, 1:28am UTC](https://discussion.listary.com/t/is-there-any-chance-of-an-portable-version/8506/5 "2023-09-03T01:28:13Z")

</div>

There is no portable version for Listary 6? I have been staying on v5 until 6 matures a bit.

@Channing is there any chance this will be fixed in the future? I rely on portable software heavily and portability is huge dealbreaker for v6.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ron](https://discussion.listary.com/user_avatar/discussion.listary.com/ron/32/150_2.png) [@ron](https://discussion.listary.com/u/ron)\
**Post date:** [September 13, 2023, 1:03pm UTC](https://discussion.listary.com/t/is-there-any-chance-of-an-portable-version/8506/6 "2023-09-13T13:03:14Z")

</div>

Could it be made possible to at least keep the application portable for the auto-directory-switching for dialog boxes and for the pop-up-menu? When using the user want’s to use the other function(s) like the search-indexed function, the application then informs the user it needs to install component(s) and then installs them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HyperCriSiS](https://discussion.listary.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/h/8e8cbc/32.png) [@HyperCriSiS](https://discussion.listary.com/u/HyperCriSiS)\
**Post date:** [November 4, 2023, 10:41pm UTC](https://discussion.listary.com/t/is-there-any-chance-of-an-portable-version/8506/7 "2023-11-04T22:41:43Z")

</div>

It does not for everyone. I do not care about UAC. Also UAC can be automated.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diego\_F](https://discussion.listary.com/user_avatar/discussion.listary.com/diego_f/32/1999_2.png) [@Diego\_F](https://discussion.listary.com/u/Diego_F)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2023, 12:01pm UTC](https://discussion.listary.com/t/is-there-any-chance-of-an-portable-version/8506/9 "2023-11-07T12:01:40Z")

</div>

> Also UAC can be automated

Hey. How can you do that?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![horst](https://discussion.listary.com/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/h/edb3f5/32.png) [@horst](https://discussion.listary.com/u/horst)\
**Post date:** [November 7, 2023, 2:59pm UTC](https://discussion.listary.com/t/is-there-any-chance-of-an-portable-version/8506/10 "2023-11-07T14:59:34Z")

</div>

He can’t without having an elevated process running.  
That’s a useless idea to overcome the requirement for admin rights.
